The Natural Theory of Relativity
by Murray Tovi

The conditional discovery of an invisible colossal force everywhere in the sky indicates that classical science is the correct matrix for understanding the cosmos. And yes it has flaws but those flaws can now be removed.

We begin that repair with a contemporary of Isaac Newton who found fault with his three laws of motion and his laws of gravitation. His objection, on scientific grounds, was that the effects Newton chronicled in detail were incomplete, missing their source or cause(s), so how could he, as a scientist, publish without them.

Newton, however, diligently looked for the cause(s) though unsuccessfully, and yes he decided to publish knowing the work was incomplete. It was, as will be shown, a critical flaw.

Unfortunately he did not know then that there were such things as galaxies and further that they, including what was to be later called the Milky Way, were moving away from an ancient event billions of years old and moving through the void of space at speeds that were incomprehensible.

Unfortunately when that knowledge finally became available centuries later, Einstein’s logic-defying theories were dominating scientific inquiry. So again the cause(s) of these fundamental phenomena went undiscovered.

Publishing without cause(s) was not the only mistake Newton made. His formula E=mv¹ failed and he did not pursue an empirical explanation. Deeply religious, he believed in God’s will in regard to this failure.

It was left to an obscure Monk to discover, dropping metal balls into soft clay from different heights, that the faster the metal balls dropped, the force with which they impressed the clay was exponential to their speed.

His formula E=mv² remains today as an essential pillar in physics. This marked the beginning of a belief in classical science that something can come from nothing as an impact of a moving body releases more energy than logic can sustain. This is called the multiplier effect.

Except that something does not come from nothing as rats do not spontaneously generate from dirty rags. As such E=mv¹ was not a failure. It was, instead, a path to the truth.

For there was nothing wrong with Newton’s formula if there were no resisting forces in altering a body’s motion. This resistance we know as inertia when accelerating and momentum when decelerating. Overcoming the resistance from inertia or momentum requires an inordinate amount of energy.

As an example, if inertia did not exist the energy currently required to go from 0-50 miles per hour in 60 seconds would carry the same body to 2500 miles per hour in the same amount of time. This is called the theoretical velocity of an object in motion.

To go from 0-100 mph in 60 seconds the theoretical velocity increases to 10,000 mph as the faster you go from zero the greater the percentage of energy required to overcome the resisting force. At 50 mph it is 98%. At 100 mph it is 99% and so on up to the speed of light where it is 99.9993%.

Overcoming resistance is represented as the kinetic energy of a body in motion and separate from the energy going into velocity (which confused Newton).

At the speed of light barrier, then, the resisting force to increased movement is as mentioned 99.9993%, which may explain why matter, at that point, theoretically disintegrates. Somewhat like hitting a heavily fortified brick wall at 89.99 billion kilometers per second (the theoretical velocity).

In an impact then, or in conversion from matter into energy at the speed of light barrier (another form of impact), only the exact amount of energy invested to achieve that velocity along with the exact value of the mass are released.

Nothing more. Nothing less. As such there is no multiplier effect. Not here and not in E=mc² which is exactly the same formula as E=mv² in this analysis, v being the speed of light.

E=mv² is now replaced by E=mv. E=mc² is replaced by E=mc. The v and c are defined as the theoretical velocity of the mass if there was no resistance in order to calculate the exact amount of energy invested to reach the current velocity.

The current velocity is squared to establish the theoretical velocity. It is not squared to create energy from nowhere.

The new formula, however, does not provide the speed of m at the speed of light barrier as does E=mc² (incorrectly). For example, we know from accelerating a nuMeson to near light speed that this tiny particle of matter lives twenty times longer.

This suggests that time may be slowing to .05 of our time/space near the speed of light barrier, suggesting the nuMeson, in its reality, is moving just under 6,000,000 kilometers per second, as under this hypothesis the speed of light is relative to the speed of time.

If the nuMeson was a space ship measuring the speed of a light beam passing it, it would register its time adjusted speed at 6,000,000 kilometers per second. Someone on Earth measuring the same light beam would clock it at 300,000 kilometers per second. The “speed” of light has not changed, only the speed of time has changed which effects matter in how it ages. It has no effect on electromagnetic energy.

Einstein’s famous illustration that a starship moving just below the speed of light does not move anywhere near the speed of a light beam passing it in the same direction is utterly preposterous.

The speed of light is not mysterious or metaphysical or quasi-supernatural but rather, logical, empirical, relative, rational and as natural as Mom’s apple pie.

To continue, the existence of an enveloping force logically explains the cause of gravity (which eluded Newton and everyone else since) by redefining it as a compressing (not a pulling down) force caused by displacement of the force field’s space by a spinning heavenly body.

Nothing changes in the effects of gravity. The degree of gravitational force or compression is now just determined by the volume of displacement causing the stretched field of force to compress around the violating body. This follows the same natural law used in determining the pressure on the hull of a ship from how much water it displaces. It produces exactly the same numbers.

As such, it redefines Black Holes, naturally, as super-colossal sized stars with Blue and Red Giants, their precursors, looking for a little more mass to blink out entirely.

It thereby rejects the theory of singularity not only as illogical and quasi-supernatural but also as completely unnecessary.

In regard to Newton’s three laws of motion, if you push against something and something resists that push by releasing energy in the opposite direction then that resistance logically indicates that something is out there. These manifestations suggest a natural device to maintain a path of least resistance for the force’s likely primary function as the engine driving the expansion of each galaxy. The path of least resistance does not appear to be the mass changing velocity but rather the energy moving the mass in an unbalanced direction.

That something is the same something eluding Galileo in his experiment with two falling bodies. This involved a mysterious phenomenon when two objects of substantially different weights fall at exactly the same speed.

The existence of the force in combination with gravity explains why falling bodies behave the way they do. This due to the compressing force of gravity, now redefined, compressing a falling object against the resisting force with the force pushing back achieving equilibrium between the two forces.

It explains why we can’t find the anti-gravity cosmological constant around any stars (including the Sun) or a preponderance of dark matter anywhere in the Universe after generations of searching as the force is the glue, not gravity that holds a galaxy together.

It explains logically, not paradoxically, why a laser hits a missile in flight in a Star Wars test and why telemetry reaches a space probe millions of miles away on time to initiate a critical course maneuver as all forms of electromagnetic energy are modified in trajectory and velocity to conform to the force’s forward motion.

It logically explains why galaxies form spirals like a drop of cream in a cup of coffee and perhaps why planets have elliptical orbits.

It logically explains the previously logically unexplainable null effect of the watershed 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment. This as a natural consequence of the field of force, everywhere in the sky, modifying the velocities of the rerouted split beam to conform to the field’s forward motion returning them synchronized in velocity to a registering plate.

Einstein’s speed of light paradox theory, previously used to explain this phenomenon, requires a leap of faith like walking on water. In science such a view should be regarded as absurd and not as the foundation of the most important formula to come out of the human species.

The force logically explains why rotating a space ship in empty space creates a gravitational effect as again something does not come from nothing.

There is evidence as well that suggests that this expansion force is possibly the Universe’s repository for every form of energy (perhaps even including time) putting into question the fundamental relationship between matter and energy. As such it disputes the law of conservation of energy stating that nothing can be destroyed.

Here we re-evaluate two previously unrelated watershed events in 1964. First, the Alvager neutral pion accelerator experiment now suggesting that matter does not metamorphose into energy, but rather is exchanged from the field’s repository to maintain some sort of equilibrium in the Universe.

Second, Penzias’ and Wilson’s discovery of microwave radiation everywhere in the sky, a clear indication of the field’s presence and not as currently believed a residue of the Big Bang (not a very logical assumption to begin with) and for which they won the Nobel prize.

Existence of a hypothetically permeating envelope of force/energy suggests increased credibility for telekinesis, telepathy, out of body experiences, the human aura and a multitude of ancient stories and procedures passed on hundreds, sometimes thousands of years by generations of tribal elders, spiritual healers, shamans, medicine men and the like. They couldn’t all be wrong.

It also suggests that the biological energy that runs our bodies is drawn daily from the enveloping field during sleep by exchanging matter for energy.

It redefines Astrology as the study of Earth flowing in an orbital eddy in the downward stream of the force and around the Sun passing through different sections of energy-laden space containing God knows what.

It suggests, based on re-evaluating red-shift data and considering the behavior of an unconfined explosion that the Universe is spherically shaped and about 2.2 billion light years in diameter. Of course this also means that all galaxies are moving at a unified velocity of at least 20,000 kilometers per second away from the Big Bang.

Peking is farther from New York than Paris but all three are equidistant from the center of the Earth, the same way all the galaxies may be equidistant from the Big Bang epicenter but not equidistant from each other. It explains that light coming from other galaxies is usually distorted, the degree of which is determined by the trajectory relationship between the Milky Way and the specific galaxy.

Those galaxies moving directly away from us have the least distortion as their light is only slowed while in their hypothesized encapsulating field while other galaxies appear as seen through a distorted lens. Here we are only seeing light having been considerably bent in varying degrees from different stars within.

These “distorted” galaxies are directly moving away from the Big Bang but not directly away from us. Some Hubbell photos clearly show a semi-transparent sac enveloping each galaxy.

Most other images show a glow enveloping each galaxy. The vacuum of space, alone, does not allow for such phenomena.

If, in fact there are such energy/force field sacs surrounding galaxies, then space travel may be more practical than currently believed. Outside the sacs there should be no resisting forces so that energy used in propulsion would carry a spacecraft 9900% farther in the same amount of time with no effect on the human body.

Combined with the effects of time slowing, speeds in the hundreds of millions, if not billions of miles per second would be theoretically possible and would not necessarily take that much “time” to achieve.

To go then to the other side of the Milky Way, a spacecraft, still moving below the speed of light barrier, would go around it, not through it, the same way a sailing ship would circumvent a land mass.

The problem is that any action/reaction propulsion system wouldn’t work outside a galaxy sac so going from any point A to any point B would require an action only engine yet to be invented.

Finally, though this discovery offers no answer(s) for the origins of the Big Bang it does cause some observations to be made. Since everything so far has had a strictly logical explanation it is reasonable to assume that one exists here as well and that something again does not come from nothing as the theory of zero volume proposes.

That being the case we can say that time did not begin with the Big Bang and if that is true then the Universe in whatever form it was in 13-15 billion years ago, it was in motion.

This suggests that the Universe is not only expanding but that as a composite it is still moving in a linear direction.

Is then the velocity of electromagnetic energy an exact manifestation or resonance of that linear velocity? The speed of light, perhaps too, does not come from nothing. And if so how does that affect the wave/particle argument, if at all?

It is unclear at this time, what effects, if any, this "discovery" has on any other formula, theory, observation, etc, currently in vogue in the discipline of physics.

This synopsis is concluded.