|
This experiment proves that the Big Bang and the speed of light paradox theories cannot both be true. It specifically proves that if the Universe is expanding then there can be no paradox in the movement of light, that it must be natural and relative. We begin by assuming, based on red-shift analysis, that the Big Bang occurred over ten billion years ago and that all galaxies are fleeing that event at speeds over 1000 miles per second. Simple Algebra teaches that if you are in a car moving at 60 mph and another car passes you in the opposite direction at a relative speed of 120 mph you can deduce that the other car is moving at 60 mph in actual speed. Yet when we measure the speed of light knowing Earth is in complicated motion we conclude that the relative passing speed is also the actual one. We so conclude because no matter which direction light moves in relation to Earth’s movement this so-called “relative” speed measured is always the same, so how could it be relative? Albert Einstein explains this dilemma in his paradox theory which claims that light (in a vacuum) moves away from any moving object at 299,792.458 kilometers per second faster while only moving at 299,792.458 kilometers per second. The laser drag experiment was conducted in an open field in central Florida and consisted of a construction laser used for leveling and a foot square white target separated by 25 feet. Both were secured to the ground by posts set in concrete making them immobile. The beam when turned on would move at a 45 degree angle to the longitudinal and latitudinal lines of Earth. The graphic below alters the proportions of the distances and objects for illustration purposes only. It has no effect on the outcome of the experiment.
On October 17, 2000 the laser was turned on and kept on for 72 hours allowing the Earth three full revolutions at 1000 miles per hour (at the Equator), three days at 18 miles per second orbital trajectory around the Sun and three days of the Sun’s orbital trajectory at a few hundred miles per second around the center of the galaxy and three days of the galaxy’s escape velocity from the Big Bang at some unknown thousands of miles per second and in some unknown direction. It was assumed that with all this complicated movement, at some point in the 72 hours, the laser beam would be near parallel with the line of the Milky Way’s escape trajectory from the Big Bang and at another time near perpendicular to that line. Since we cannot red-shift ourselves in order to get some sense of the Milky Way’s velocity and since we needed a number to evaluate the experiment 10,000 miles per second was chosen. The gauge could have just as easily been set anywhere from 1000 miles per second to just below the speed of light without altering the experiment’s principle conclusions. Since the laser beam stayed on the center of the target throughout the 72 hours we can conclude that the beam stayed on center when the beam was perpendicular or parallel to the expansion line. And that is the telling factor that allows analysis of these two “events” as seen from an outside perspective. It should be noted that the target center is defined as a circle having a 3/8th inch radius from the center of the beam’s initial impact on the target. This is slightly larger than the diameter of the beam in order to adjust for temperature variations, weather conditions, battery changes, etc. Animation 1 follows a section of the laser beam from the time it leaves the laser gun to the time it hits the center of the target while the laser beam is near parallel with the Milky Way’s escape trajectory. It is analyzed from both the paradox theory and by applying logic. Animation 2 applies the paradox theory when the beam is near perpendicular to the expansion line. Animation 3 applies logic when the beam is near perpendicular to the expansion line. It should be noted that the relative speed of the laser beam and the speed of the target is altered for illustration purposes. This has no bearing on the outcome.
Albert Einstein predicted that starlight passing near the surface of the Sun would be deflected by its colossal gravity. He estimated the bend at 1/3600th of a degree of arc. This was confirmed in the 1919 and 1922 solar eclipse observations and launched his ascendancy. The measured deflection in the laser drag experiment appears to be thousands of times greater. Though the beam is moving laterally as it is moving forward, it appears straight to our tandem moving perspective. Further, it would appear that the beam at any other angle throughout the 72 hours would be both deflected and either pushed up or pushed down in velocity in varying predictable and exacting combinations. To summarize: If the Universe is expanding then light behaves naturally, not paradoxically. Measurements of the speed of light and observations of its trajectory are, in almost all instances, illusions caused by a natural phenomenon. Like gravity, this phenomenon is invisible and everywhere in the sky. It is moving, like Earth’s gravitational field, somewhere between 1000 miles per second and just below the speed of light. On June 27, 2002 the laser drag experiment was repeated with modifications to discover any flaws in the first experiment. The experiment lasted four days as now four targets were positioned in a circumference 33 feet away from a single laser. The laser was rotated every twenty four hours to move from the center of one target to the center of the next one. Two targets were positioned at 45 degrees angles to the longitudinal and latitudinal lines of the Earth so each beam would follow a path 90 degrees to the other. The third target was positioned parallel to the longitudinal line and the final one parallel to the latitudinal line. Again the target center(s) were continuously impacted through each 24 hour cycle. These results corroborate the results of the October 20-22, 2000 experiment. An indoor experiment is planned to remove the weather and temperature variations to determine if there was a minor linear drift within the 3/4 inch center caused by an unknown factor. Finally, It should be noted that a 115 year old mystery that changed the course of science has likely just been solved.
Murray Tovi, Tovi Sciences For more information email us at tovisciences@aol.com Return to Synopsis
Animation and web design by Stephen Gallagher | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
